4 Ways Outsourcing Damages Industry – San Francisco Chronicle

by admin on March 6, 2012

The outsourcing  of human  capital to countries in the developing world is a cost-saving measure  employed by an increasing number of companies across the United States. It is  estimated that the number of jobs outsourced offshore by 2015 could be as high  as 3.3 million. While the practice has preserved capital  for many national and international companies, it could be damaging to American  industry as a whole, in the long term. The draining of jobs, knowledge and  innovation may eventually give other countries a technological leg up on the  United States, and depress the American economy further. These are four major  threats to U.S industry caused by outsourcing.

SEE: How  Productivity And Globalization Affect The Economy
Higher  Semi-Permanent Unemployment Jobs that move offshore often do not  come back. The lower wages and operating costs, plus the simpler administrative  requirements in countries such as India and Russia, make operating in those  countries cheaper and easier.

Without new jobs being created in America, unemployment rises and a higher  base unemployment rate becomes the norm. It could be decades before developing  countries reach their saturation point and wages are driven higher. In the  meantime, more American workers are out of work with few prospects of landing a  job.
Loss of Intellectual Capital In the beginning,  the outsourcing movement was meant to transfer low-skill jobs out and retain  highly-skilled jobs as an  important asset for the advancement of the country’s economy. However, as emerging  economies work hard to build their own intellectual capital, American  companies are increasingly contracting accountants, engineers and IT specialists  at a rate far lower than it would cost them in the U.S.

This “brain drain” has long-term repercussions for American industry. Once a  skill has been largely moved offshore, it is difficult to regain. For example,  if most publishers outsource book design and layout work to Chinese firms, over  time there will be fewer designers in the U.S. who have that skill. It also  means that there are fewer students of the craft, due to lack of  opportunities.
Loss of Manufacturing Capacity When  industry moves offshore, not only do we lose the knowledge, we also lose the  manufacturing capacity. For example, the U.S. was once the leader in solar cell  manufacturing, but most American solar technology companies have set up new  plants in countries that offer significant incentives, such as Germany. The  manufacturing capacity is gone and, if the U.S. ever wanted to repatriate these  types of industries, it would take years to re-develop the manufacturing  equipment and train engineers.
Reliance on Foreign  Relations Another risk that outsourcing companies face is the  potential for relations with other countries to change. For example if the U.S.  were to engage in a trade  war with China, the Chinese government may levy tariffs  against foreign companies operating within its borders or on goods crossing the  border. In 1996, the Helms-Burton Act restricted U.S. companies from doing  business in and with Cuba, forcing many companies to totally redesign their  operations outside of the country.

Investors in international markets can also suffer losses to their portfolios if  relations between two countries break down or if a foreign country falls into  economic duress, which negatively affects the activities of companies  operating in that region.
The Bottom Line The short  term gain derived by companies that outsource operations offshore is eclipsed by  the long term damage to the U.S. economy. Over time, the loss of jobs and  expertise will make innovation in the U.S. difficult, while, at the same time,  building the brain trust of other countries.

Original story – 4  Ways Outsourcing Damages Industry

Copyright (c) 2012 Investopedia US. All rights reserved. Investopedia.com is  a division of ValueClick, Inc.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2012/03/06/investopedia74443.DTL#ixzz1oTZ2mPrK

Previous post:

Next post: