American manufacturers pine for home as COVID disruptions, Trump tariffs shake up supplies – USA TODAY

by admin on December 17, 2020

President Donald Trump’s trade war was supposed to encourage American manufacturers to pack up their Chinese and other international operations and move them to the U.S.

The same is true of COVID-19, which disrupted just-in-time deliveries by shutting down factories around the world.

Instead, the uncertainty caused by Trump’s trade war and COVID-19 supply chain disruptions paralyzed corporate decisionmakers, and though more than 600 U.S. manufacturers opted to return to the United States this year, the number is down by one-third compared with 2018.

“A lot of companies are like frozen deer in the headlights,” said Jim Tomkins, chairman of Tomkins International, a North Carolina consulting firm that helps manufacturers decide whether to bring their operations back to the U.S.

“They don’t like having to depend on China. They would maybe like to bring back manufacturing to Mexico or the U.S. But because of the uncertainty, they can’t tell me their requirements. They don’t know how much they’re going to sell. And given how much they don’t know, this probably isn’t the best time to make any major capital investments.”

Where are the wipes? Shortages now likely to last until mid-2021.

Bye, bye 2020:More than half of Americans are optimistic about their finances in 2021.

Jim Tompkins, chairman of Tompkins International

“Their best bet,” he said, “is to wait for the vaccine and see what happens after that.”

1 million new U.S. manufacturing jobs

Since 2010, more than 4,700 companies have brought back all or some of their manufacturing operations to the U.S., according to the Reshoring Initiative, an Illinois consulting firm dedicated to helping manufacturers find a way back home. The moves have created nearly 1 million American manufacturing jobs.

That doesn’t mean the U.S. manufacturing sector as a whole is growing. It actually has thousands fewer manufacturing companies than it did 10 years ago, according to the Economic Policy Institute. But thanks to reshoring, total employment is up by 403,000 jobs over that period, and there’s a chance the beleaguered sector could experience a resurgence if people like Harry Moser have their way.

The founder of the Reshoring Initiative, Moser is focused on convincing companies that local production can make sense in some circumstances.

“You just have to do the math,” Moser said.

Harry Moser founded the Reshoring Initiative in 2010 to bring manufacturing jobs back to the U.S.

Moser said bringing operations back to the U.S. can lower the total cost of manufacturing for as many as 30% of manufacturers, especially for automotive companies, appliance makers, and providers of essential products like personal protective equipment, pharmaceuticals, and 5G wireless technology.

His goal is to bring back 5 million jobs over the next 30 years. But to do that, he says, the U.S. has to triple the number of manufacturing jobs it brings back every year. Moser said that would be possible if currency exchange rates were more favorable to the dollar, the industry put more emphasis on apprenticeships and two-year manufacturing degrees to churn out more workers, and health care costs were lower.

Carbon Dioxide Shortages, Urgent Pharma Cold Chain Needs Drive Up Demand for Dry Ice

Tariffs got in the way

According to numbers Moser provided, 2018 was the best year for reshoring manufacturing jobs to the U.S. on record. More than 900 companies made the move that year, generating a record 180,000 jobs. But Trump’s tariffs got in the way.

Rust belt revival:Donald Trump promised to make the Rust Belt great again. He has not.

Digital revolution:Intel insight: CEO on U.S. manufacturing’s role in driving the digital revolution

The problem with the tariffs, Moser said, is that they weren’t focused. Businesses were left wondering what to do, so they stopped bringing operations to the U.S..

“In theory, tariffs would have helped to convince U.S. companies to repatriate and cut back on imports if they were applied universally in terms of one country – so you would be encouraged to buy from Vietnam instead of China, or if they were applied in terms of one product,” Moser said. “But this was a piecemeal, chaotic system.”

Previous post:

Next post: