Moto X: First US-made smartphone isn’t more expensive – Lansing State Journal

by admin on August 29, 2013

<!–Saxotech Paragraph Count: 9
–>

Motorola’s new Moto X phone doesn’t cost more to make simply because it’s assembled in Texas, research firm IHS said Wednesday.

The Moto X is the first smartphone to carry the “Made in the U.S.A.” designation. Labor costs are higher in the U.S. compared with Asian factories. But IHS said the Moto X is 5 percent cheaper to make than Samsung’s Galaxy S4 phone. The firm said the Moto X’s overall production cost is 9 percent more than that of Apple’s iPhone 5.

The labor cost of a phone is a small part of production cost. IHS estimates that labor and other assembly cost Motorola $12 per phone for the Moto X, bringing the production cost to $226. That compares with $207 for the iPhone 5 and $237 for the Galaxy S4. IHS said Motorola is able to keep the cost of parts low by using standard components.

By assembling the phone in Fort Worth, Texas, Motorola is able to let customers order custom designs online for delivery within four days. Standard black or white models are available immediately at retail stores.

“With the Moto X, Motorola is reaping the public-relations and customization upsides of producing a smartphone in the United States, while maintaining competitive hardware costs,” said Andrew Rassweiler, senior director for cost benchmarking services at IHS.

IHS said the estimated $12 for assembly is $3.50 to $4 more than other leading phones.

“Our initial estimate suggests the additional costs of onshoring the Moto X are relatively low,” IHS said.

The phone went on sale last Friday, starting with AT&T. It’s coming to other carriers, including Verizon this week. The Moto X’s price is about $200 with a two-year contract.

The Moto X is Motorola’s first phone designed under Google, which bought Motorola Mobility for $12.4 billion last year.

Source Article from http://www.lansingstatejournal.com/viewart/20130828/BUSINESS/308280109/Moto-X-First-US-made-smartphone-isn-t-more-expensive

Previous post:

Next post: